RACISM CARD LOOKING A LITTLE DOG-EARED

(Reproduced from Ann Coulter http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2013-08-14.html#read_more

August 14, 2013

Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on printMore Sharing Services0

Do liberals have any arguments for their idiotic ideas besides calling their opponents "racist"?

The two big public policies under attack by the left this week are "stop-and-frisk" policing and voter ID laws. Democrats denounce both policies as racist. I'm beginning to suspect they're getting lazy in their arguments.

Stop-and-frisk was a crucial part of the package of law enforcement measures implemented by New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani that saved the city. Under David Dinkins, who preceded Giuliani, murders averaged about 2,000 a year. There were 714 murders in New York the year Giuliani left office. Continuing Giuliani's policing techniques, Mayor Michael Bloomberg's New York had only 419 murders last year.

Just during his first year in office, Giuliani's policies cut the murder rate an astonishing 20 percent. That first year of his administration was responsible for 35 percent of the crime drop nationwide from 1993 to 1995. The New York Times hailed this remarkable achievement with an article headlined, "New York City Crime Falls but Just Why Is a Mystery."

It was mostly black lives that were saved by Giuliani's crime policies. By the end of his administration, the Rev. Calvin Butts, liberal pastor of Harlem's Abyssinian Baptist Church, was comparing Giuliani to King Josiah of the Bible, who "brought order, peace, the law back to the land." The black minister told The New York Times, "I really think that without Giuliani, we would have been overrun."

About the same time as the Rev. Butts was comparing Giuliani to King Josiah, Richard Goldstein of The Village Voice claimed he felt less safe in New York under Giuliani. It was the ravings of a madman, like saying winter is warmer than summer. But now, Goldstein's ideas are being delivered from the federal bench by Judge Shira Scheindlin, who recently held New York City's stop-and-frisk policies unconstitutional.

Yes, Democrat Bob Filner can pat down his female employees, but cops can't pat down suspected criminals.

Liberals wail about guns, but how do they imagine police get guns off the street without going to high-crime neighborhoods and stopping young men acting suspiciously? Giuliani's policing policies, including stop-and-frisk, reduced gun homicides in New York by 75 percent within five years.

It is precisely the fear of being caught with a gun that induces young hoodlums not to carry them. The word gets out: Don't carry a gun! It's not worth the risk.

Of course cops don't find many guns anymore! That's because they're doing stop-and-frisk.

By liberals' logic, the government should stop doing meat inspections because it turns up so few cases of contamination these days, anyway. We can also drop the metal detectors at airports. How many people does the TSA actually catch trying to sneak guns onto airplanes?

Have liberals polled the elderly black residents of high-crime neighborhoods on stop-and-frisk? As soon as the word gets out that it's now safe to carry weapons, spray paint, drugs and stolen goods again, criminals will rule the streets and the elderly will, once more, be confined to their homes. As Martin Luther King said, crime is "the nightmare of the slum family."

But liberals don't care about the innocent black victims of crime. They don't care about citizens being prisoners in their own homes -- as long as it's not in their neighborhoods. The important thing is to self-righteously preen about racism.

When a policy that has saved thousands of black lives is attacked as "racist," the word has no meaning. At this rate, liberals will be claiming that peanut butter sandwiches are racist -- except that wouldn't be as crazy.

Voter ID laws don't actually save black lives the way stop-and-frisk policies do, but it's not clear how such laws hurt them. I suppose the argument is that by allowing Democrats to steal elections, they can pass all those laws that improve black lives immeasurably, like promoting trial lawyers, gay marriage, abortion and amnesty for illegals. You know, the Democratic policies that really enhance black lives.

The claim that modern voter ID laws are a racist Republican plot to prevent minorities from voting is complicated by the fact that, in 2011, such a law was enacted by the overwhelmingly Democratic Rhode Island legislature and, in fact, was pushed through by black Democrats.

Despite the pleas of national Democrats who realized their cover was being blown, the state senate's only black member, Democrat Harold Metts, sponsored a voted ID bill. He said he'd heard complaints about voter fraud for years, telling the story of one poll worker who encountered a voter who couldn't spell his own last name.

A black legislator in the House, Anastasia Williams, complained that when she showed up to vote in 2006, she was told she had already voted. Another time, she saw a Hispanic man vote, go to the parking lot and change his clothes, then go back in and vote again.

If white liberals are so concerned about black votes counting, why don't they ever vote for black representatives in their own congressional districts? Black Republicans are always elected from majority white districts: Gary Franks, J.C. Watts, Tim Scott and Allen West.

But black Democrats apparently can get elected to Congress only from specially designated minority districts. How come white liberals won't vote for a black representative? Can't a black person represent Nita Lowey's district?

Democrats do nothing for black Americans except mine them for votes, which they do by telling tall tales about racist Republicans.

COPYRIGHT 2013 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK 

Unfortunately DOJ like the rest of this administration is above the law. And all Republicans do is talk, hold hearings, submit subpoenas, posture, talk tough, hold more hearings, fight amongst themselves, and essentially do nothing to take back our Republic from the radical left

J. Christian Adams: DOJ using the law as ‘a way to punish your opponents’

Posted on 18 August, 2013 by clyde

According to the DailyCaller.com J. Christian Adams is a talented lawyer who worked inside Eric Holder’s Justice Department until he could take it no longer. He left in 2010 and wrote a New York Times bestselling book, “Injustice,” to expose what he saw and learned.

Today, he is practicing law, speaking out against the Justice Department, writing for PJ Media and battling his first Internal Revenue Service audit on the side. In the second of this three-part interview, Adams says he believes the institution of law is under attack like never before

“[The law is] meant to be a leveler, and that’s what’s unique about our country, about America, is we’re the first country ever founded for the principle that every individual has individual dignity, divine inspired individual dignity, to be treated by their government as an individual, not differently than somebody whose brother is an earl,” he said. “These people in power reject at its core that principle. They believe that power is given out based on political donations, ideology, opposition to coal — name it. It’s something that you gain favor and are treated differently by your government based on who you are, and that’s so anti-American.”

Adams went on to say that Republicans and their consultants are stuck in the ’90s and not battling the left effectively.

“We’re in a different kind of world now where the left is on the march through the institutions, through the government, through the academy, and they have brass knuckles,” he said. “And they have their media outlets, and they have Media Matters, and MSNBC, and ThinkProgress and George Soros, and I can go down the list. And the right is just getting started. And they don’t have the same sorts of institutional weaponry that the left does. So it becomes very easy to deceive when your arsenal is bigger. And I think that was the problem in the last election.”

Under the Obama Justice Department, he said, “law is a tool to help those in power aid those they agree with. It is not a great leveler. It’s no longer a means to make everybody equal and to create those fences that everybody must stay within. It’s a way to punish your opponents and reward your enemies.”

Adams puts some hope in the power of the purse, if the Republican-controlled House of Representatives would just “line out” radical policies and budgets with the authority our founders gave them.

The Clintons really need to be prohibited from ever holding any future political office for life. They are horrid people.

WND EXCLUSIVE

CLINTON RAPE RAP LINKED TO NEW POL SEX FIENDS

Weiner, Spitzer, Filner now benefiting

With Barack Obama dogged by multiple scandals – from Benghazi to NSA surveillance to rampant IRS abuses – many Americans are asking whether he can make it through his second term.

Likewise, with sex scandals in the news – from ex-congressman Anthony Weiner to former New York governor Eliot Spitzer to San Diego Mayor Bob Filner – many are asking how such disgraced leaders can possibly believe they can re-assume positions of power and public trust.

The approaching anniversary of one of the most extraordinary presidential scandals in history may well hold the answer to both questions.

Fifteen years ago, perhaps the most serious allegation ever levied against a sitting U.S. president – a nationally televised accusation of forcible rape, widely regarded by the public as credible – came to light. Yet Bill Clinton not only survived the allegation, he also survived an impeachment that included other sexually lurid charges and went on to become the beloved elder statesman of the Democratic Party.

‘I told him no’

It was Juanita Broaddrick who in 1998 first went public with the story of alleged rape two decades earlier, reportedly on April 25, 1978. In February 1999, she told her story to a national TV audience on “Dateline NBC” to Emmy-winning reporter Lisa Myers.

Broaddrick said she was at a conference in Little Rock, Ark., when Clinton approached her in her hotel room. He “turned me around and started kissing me, and that was a real shock. I first pushed him away. I just told him ‘no.’ … He trie[d] to kiss me again. He starts biting on my lip. … And then he forced me down on the bed. I just was very frightened. I tried to get away from him. I told him ‘no.’ … He wouldn’t listen.”

At the time the story appeared, the Washington Post reported that it had interviewed several of Broaddrick’s friends, including Norma Kelsey, who “said she saw Broaddrick’s swollen lip and torn pantyhose that day.”

In “Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine,” author and feminist Candice E. Jackson devotes an entire chapter to “The Rape of Juanita Broaddrick.”

After providing the background to the incident – Broaddrick had volunteered to help in Clinton’s gubernatorial race and had accepted, albeit reluctantly, Clinton’s suggestion they meet in her hotel room instead of the hotel’s coffee shop that was “crawling” with reporters – the author lays out Broaddrick’s chilling account:

She felt “a little bit uneasy” meeting him in her hotel room, but felt a “real friendship toward this man” and didn’t feel any “danger” in him coming to her room. When Clinton arrived she had coffee ready on a little table under a window overlooking a river. Then “he came around me and sort of put his arm over my shoulder to point to this little building and he said he was real interested if he became governor to restore that little building and then all of a sudden, he turned me around and started kissing me. And that was a real shock.” Broaddrick pushed him away and said, “No, please don’t do that” and told Clinton she was married. But he tried to kiss her again. This time he bit her upper lip. She tried to pull away from him but he forced her onto the bed. “And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him ‘No,’ that I didn’t want this to happen, but he wouldn’t listen to me.” But he “was such a different person at that moment, he was just a vicious awful person.” At some point she stopped resisting. She explained, “It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to ‘Please stop.’ And that’s when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip.”

Clinton didn’t linger long afterward. “When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says, ‘You better get some ice on that.’ And he turned and went out the door.” The whole encounter lasted less than 30 minutes, but it changed Juanita Broaddrick’s life forever.

When questioned by an interviewer, “Is there any way at all that Bill Clinton could have thought that this was consensual?” Juanita Broaddrick answered, “No. Not with what I told him, and with how I tried to push him away. It was not consensual.” The interviewer, NBC’s Lisa Myers, pressed for specificity. “You’re saying that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted you, that he raped you?” Broaddrick answered, “Yes.”

Broaddrick’s friend Norma said that when she left their shared hotel room that morning, Broaddrick had told her that she planned to meet with Clinton. When Norma called around lunchtime, however, Broaddrick sounded so upset that Norma returned to the room to find Broaddrick’s lip and mouth badly swollen and her pantyhose ripped off. Broaddrick told Norma that Clinton had sexually assaulted her.

… David Broaddrick recalls that her lip was “black” and “mentally she was in bad shape.” Broaddrick told three other friends soon after the attack, all of whom vouch for her story.

Broaddrick said she didn’t talk about her experience earlier because she just didn’t think anyone would believe her. Clinton attorney David Kendall denied Broaddrick’s allegations, characterizing them as “absolutely false.”

After the NBC broadcast aired, a public opinion poll by Zogby International showed that most Americans either believed Clinton was guilty of the 1978 rape of Broaddrick or said more information was needed to make a true judgment.

 ‘Good historians’

Today, news headlines almost daily include political sex scandals, including these recent instances:

·         Ex-congressman Anthony Weiner is running for mayor of New York City despite his obsession with electronically sending graphic sexual images of himself to young women.

·         Former governor Eliot Spitzer, running for New York City comptroller, ignores recent polls showing 59 percent of New Yorkers view him unfavorably. He fell from power after public revelation that he patronized prostitutes.

·         San Diego Mayor Bob Filner, a Democrat, like Weiner and Spitzer, has vowed to “get help” for his “problems” – he’s accused of bullying, badgering and abusing women – but then cut out of rehab after only one week.

Illinois-based clinical psychologist Dr. Dathan Paterno blames the arrogant attitude displayed by today’s politician-perpetrators directly on Clinton.

“Modern-era politicians like Weiner, Spitzer and Filner are nothing if not good historians. They merely have to recall the survival of their patron sinner Bill Clinton and realize that all scandals are eminently survivable – for liberals, that is. All that is required is for the leftist band of brothers – media, political allies, and the voters who most aggressively and eagerly suck at the government teat – to distract, rationalize, and minimize,” Paterno said.

“Then the power carries on, transfers and remains,” he said. The men who use and abuse women in these ways retain their power and money. Only the victims are left broken, and in debt and depression. Their voices are quiet.”

When it comes to alleged Clinton victims, Broaddrick is hardly alone. The list of women who accused Clinton of sexual misdeeds reads like a beauty pageant lineup, including: Elizabeth Ward, Miss America 1981; Sally Miller Perdue, former Miss Arkansas; Gennifer Flowers, an aspiring singer and nightclub performer; Monica Lewinsky, a Beverly Hills prep school daughter of a divorced doctor and reporter. Each had life experiences that led to a vulnerability that some say predators can identify.

WND reached out to many of the women in the Clinton saga, all of whom had one thing in common: They still are trying to put the ordeal behind them.

One, who did not want her name to be used, said Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin, Weiner’s wife and close assistant to Hillary Clinton, aren’t “standing by their men” as is commonly said. Rather, they’re standing on the heads of the women their husbands have victimized.

The worst thing that could happen to women in America who have been similarly victimized, she added, is for Hillary to be elected president.

Her fear of what the media have done to her personally, emotionally and financially is the reason she does not want to talk any more and does not speak publicly.

She said the Clintons have fundamentally changed the way media cover politics.

‘The biggest victim’

David Spady, a California-based political strategist, said the advent of Hillary Clinton vying for president means more of the same.

“When Hillary Clinton got away with blaming a ‘vast right-wing conspiracy’ for Bill’s indiscretions, it set the stage for politicians like Filner, Weiner and Spitzer to simply spin their way out of trouble with female voters by becoming victims.” Spady said.

“If Hillary were elected president,” he added, “the biggest victim would be the truth.”

The author Jackson agrees, citing Clinton tactics such as “assembling a smear team to attack a grief-stricken widow (Kathleen Willey), threatening a reporter for her research into an Arkansas health care scandal, and hiring private investigators to bully an ex-flame’s family members.”

She sees an “undeniable link” between the Clintons’ liberal beliefs and misogynistic behavior. She further views Hillary as the “eager accomplice that might one day occupy the Oval Office.”

“If Hillary is elected,” said one of the women allegedly victimized by Clinton, “these men will continue to use their power and money to hurt women. Hillary was complicit in all of the intimidation, terror and cover-up that happened to these women, and the women abused by politicians since then have the Clintons – both of them – to thank. That’s just how the Clintons, and now the Democrat machine, roll.”

Meanwhile, as Barack Obama scoffs that his own scandals are “phony” and disgraced public servants like Weiner and Spitzer confidently pursue high office, the man who blazed their trail – Bill Clinton – now sits at the pinnacle of the Democratic power structure.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/clinton-beating-rape-rap-paved-way-for-others/#jUmJeI08RrHAesAx.99

Mr. Hawkins must have had a difficult time honing this list down to 25...Heck, Biden could fill this list in one speech

The 25 Stupidest Liberal Quotes Of The Last Decade

John Hawkins | Aug 17, 2013

25) Seniors love getting junk mail. It’s sometimes their only way of communicating or feeling like they’re part of the real world. -- Harry Reid

24)The number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S. -- Joe Biden

23) I took a poo in the woods hunched over like an animal. It was awesome. -- Drew Barrymore

22) Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama cannot win, and they are put in place to assure a victory by Mitt Romney… this is the plan of all the insurance companies that are owned by Mormon interests. It is unfolding as the Mormon Church planned over the last fifty years. --Roseanne Barr

21) I do believe that it’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7 — building 7, which collapsed in on itself — it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved. World Trade Center 7. World Trade [Center] 1 and 2 got hit by planes — 7, miraculously, the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible. -- Rosie O’Donnell talks Trutherism

20) Isn't it a little racist to call it Black Friday? -- Joy Behar

19) A good place to start a more civil dialog would be for my Republican colleagues in the House to change the name of the bill they have introduced to repeal health care reform. The bill, titled the “Repeal the Job Killing Health Care Law Act,” was set to come up for a vote this week, but in the wake of Gabby’s shooting, it has been postponed at least until next week. Don’t get me wrong — I’m not suggesting that the name of that one piece of legislation somehow led to the horror of this weekend — but is it really necessary to put the word “killing” in the title of a major piece of legislation? -- Chellie Pingree, Congresswoman (D-ME)

18) The Republican Party is saying that the President of the United States has bosses, that the union bosses this President around, the unions boss him around. Does that sound to you like they are trying to consciously or subconsciously deliver the racist message that, of course, of course a black man can’t be the real boss? -- Lawrence O’Donnell

17) Herman Cain is probably well-liked by some of the Republicans because it hides the racist elements of the Republican Party, conservative movement and tea party movement. People like Karl Rove like to keep the racism very covert and so Herman Cain provides this great opportunity so he can say, ‘Look: This is not a racist anti-immigrant, anti-female, anti-gay movement. Look: We have a black man.’ And look he’s polling well and he won a straw poll. -- Janeane Garofalo

16) If we want to keep our reproductive rights, we must be willing to tell our stories, to be willing and able to say, “I love my life, but I wish my mother had aborted me.” -- Lynn Beisner, the Guardian

15) Is there such a thing as a man-made stroke? In other words, did someone do this to (Democratic Senator Tim Johnson)? …I know what this [Republican] party is capable of. -- Joy Behar on The View

14) Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them. -- Mary Frances Berry, former Chairwoman, US Commission on Civil Rights

13) Now, people when I say that look at me and say, ‘What are you talking about, Joe? You’re telling me we have to go spend money to keep from going bankrupt?’ The answer is yes, that’s what I’m telling you. --Joe Biden

12) Those flowers were picked by illegal immigrants. And they’re not voting for you, b*tch. -- Joy Behar after receiving flowers from Sharon Angle

11) During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. -- Al Gore

10) Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package 500 million Americans lose their jobs. -- Nancy Pelosi

9) Watching both the health care and climate/energy debates in Congress, it is hard not to draw the following conclusion: There is only one thing worse than one-party autocracy, and that is one-party democracy, which is what we have in America today. One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. -- Thomas Friedman

8) I root for hurricanes. When, courtesy of the Weather Channel, I see one forming in the ocean off the coast of Africa, I find myself longing for it to become big and strong–Mother Nature’s fist of fury, Gaia’s stern rebuke. Considering the havoc mankind has wreaked upon nature with deforesting, stripmining, and the destruction of animal habitat, it only seems fair that nature get some of its own back and teach us that there are forces greater than our own. — James Wolcott, Vanity Fair

7) Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. -- Barack Obama

6) The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied. -- Jeremiah Wright

5) How do we know when someone like Hasan is going to make his move and do we know he’s an Islamist until he’s made his move? He makes a phone call or whatever, according to Reuters right now. Apparently he tried to contact al-Qaida. Is that the point at which you say, “This guy is dangerous?” That’s not a crime to call up al-Qaida, is it? Is it? I mean, where do you stop the guy? -- Chris Matthews

4) The medical term for Down Syndrome is Trisomy-21 or Trisomy-g. It is often shortened in medical slang to Tri-g. Is it not perfectly possible that the very name given to this poor child, being reared by Bristol, is another form of mockery of his condition, along with the “retarded baby” tag? And does the way in which this poor child was hauled around the country on a book tour, being dragged out in front of flash photographs in the middle of the night, barely clothed, suggest someone who actually cares for children with special needs, or rather sees them as a way to keep the spotlight on her? -- Andrew Sullivan

3) I propose a limitation be put on how many sqares [sic] of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don’t want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required. -- Sheryl Crow at the Huffington Post

2) Had a powerful meditation just now — caused an earthquake in Southern California. …Was meditating on Shiva mantra & earth began to shake. Sorry about that. -- Deepak Chopra thinks his meditation can cause earthquakes

1) My fear is that the whole island (of Guam) will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize. -- Democrat Congressman Hank Johnson

How could we have ever elected this fraud not once, but twice? We are truly a Nation of unattached, ill-informed, apathetic idiots

Memory Hole Dredged: Melanie Phillips’ 2008 Article on Obama

Written by Gary North on August 16, 2013

Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/08/16/memory-hole-dredged-melanie-phillips-2008-article-on-obama/#s8zjgXoGM9YxyUdH.99

Melanie Phillips

Pinch yourself

The contrast between, on the one hand, the huge amount of material about Obama’s radical associations that has been published in on-line journals and in a few brave newspapers, and on the other the refusal by big media to address it and to vilify those who do, becomes more astounding by the day. The Obamaniacs are spinning the relationship between Obama and William Ayers, former of Weather Undergound Terrorism Inc, as of no consequence because this was supposedly a chance acquaintance and because the educational project they worked on, the Annenberg Challenge, was a worthy one.

Stanley Kurtz now nails that canard by showing how, through the Annenberg Challenge, Obama and Ayers channelled funds to extremist anti-American Afrocentric ‘educational’ programmes which were a carbon-copy of the world view of Pastor Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s black racist mentor who, under pressure, Obama was forced to repudiate.  These programmes promoted, amongst other radical ideas, the ‘rites of passage’ philosophy which attempted to create a ‘virtually separate and intensely anti-American black social world’ in order to ‘counter the potentially detrimental effects of a Eurocentrically oriented society.’ One such teacher taught that

‘The submission to Western civilization and its most outstanding offspring, American civilization, is, in reality, surrender to white supremacy.’

Kurtz concludes:

However he may seek to deny it, all evidence points to the fact that, from his position as board chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, Barack Obama knowingly and persistently funded an educational project that shared the extremist and anti-American philosophy of Jeremiah Wright.

No surprise there, since back in June Kurtz pointed to evidence that Obama shared the black racism of the Trinity United Church of Christ.  In this article Obama was reported as rejecting ‘integrationist assimilation’ and wanting to channel black rage more effectively into political organisation. Kurtz dug out a chapter in a 1990 book called After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois in which Obama sketched out how radical black churches could be harnessed to help radicalise the black population. As Kurtz wrote:

So it would appear that Obama’s own writings solve the mystery of why he stayed at Trinity for 20 years. Obama’s long-held and decidedly audacious hope has been to spread Wright’s radical spirit by linking it to a viable, left-leaning political program, with Obama himself at the center. The revolutionizing power of a politically awakened black church is not some side issue, or merely a personal matter, but has been the signature theme of Obama’s grand political strategy.

Those few brave souls who do try to enlighten the public about all this come up against the kind of intimidation by Camp Obama charted here by Michael Barone: 

Stanley Kurtz appeared on Milt Rosenberg's WGN radio program in Chicago. Mr. Kurtz had been researching Mr. Obama's relationship with unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers in Chicago Annenberg Challenge papers in the Richard J. Daley Library in Chicago - papers that were closed off to him for some days, apparently at the behest of Obama supporters. Obama fans jammed WGN's phone lines and sent in hundreds of protest e-mails. The message was clear to anyone who would follow Mr. Rosenberg's example. We will make trouble for you if you let anyone make the case against The One.

Other Obama supporters have threatened critics with criminal prosecution. In September, St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch and St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce warned citizens that they would bring criminal libel prosecutions against anyone who made statements against Mr. Obama that were ‘false.’ I had been under the impression that the Alien and Sedition Acts had gone out of existence in 1801-'02. 

Not so, apparently, in metropolitan St. Louis. Similarly, the Obama campaign called for a criminal investigation of the American Issues Project when it ran ads highlighting Mr. Obama's ties to Mr. Ayers.

No such threats, of course, will be made against this new book whose publication is tactfully timed for next year so as not to frighten the horses -- Race Course Against White Supremacy, by none other than William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Meanwhile, it turns out that not only did Obama do favours for convicted Chicago fraudster Tony Rezko, but as this story reports Alexi Giannoulias, who reputedly bankrolled Michael ‘Jaws’ Giorango, a Chicagoan twice convicted of bookmaking and promoting prostitution, became Illinois state treasurer last year after Obama vouched for him, and has now has pledged to raise $100,000 for Obama’s campaign.

You have to pinch yourself – a Marxisant radical who all his life has been mentored by, sat at the feet of, worshipped with, befriended, endorsed the philosophy of, funded and been in turn funded, politically promoted and supported by a nexus comprising black power anti-white racists, Jew-haters, revolutionary Marxists, unrepentant former terrorists and Chicago mobsters, is on the verge of becoming President of the United States. And apparently it’s considered impolite to say so.

What is happening to our country? We need to cleanse our nation of all these anti-American, anti-Constitution Liberals before we become another European country

If we all did this, we'd have a different country  August 14, 2013 Cindy Kucharski

  Thanks, Cindy, for your dedication to defend our nation.  Each person makes a difference – by what they do or don’t do.  In Liberty,  Kathy Doan

From: truthsetsyoufree@reagan.com [mailto:truthsetsyoufree@reagan.com]

Dear Missouri Rodeo Cowboy Association,

I found you among the people lining up to apologize for the rodeo clown's comedy act at the state fair recently. I read your apology on your website. I am not offended by the rodeo clown exercising his freedom of speech during an act that was supposed to be comedic.  I am offended by your apology and by the ridiculous criticism from various elected officials in the state of Missouri, including your governor.  Too many brave Americans have bled and died for you all to trample freedom of speech in such a cavalier manner.  I intend to put my money where my mouth is.  Just this morning I sent this email below to a company I do business with often.

As I prepare for a trip this fall, I will re-route our travel so that we are not going through Missouri.  Your state does not deserve my business; I hope all you apologists will rethink

your misguided response.  Tell Tuffy Gessling to move to a state where the people have more sense than to elect a democrat governor, and he will find his freedom of speech alive and well. (I'm guessing they have a lot of rodeos in Texas.)   Missouri is the Show Me state. I hope you are shown that America is not down with your punitive action and infringement of freedom of speech in this case. I will appreciate if you send this on to Mr. Gessling if you have a way to do that, so he knows everyone is not against him.

Here is the email I referred to:

Dear Missouri Quilt Co,

I guess you are aware of the news about Missouri this past week regarding the rodeo clowns at the state fair.  A lot of your elected officials have been outspoken about the rodeo clown who wore an obama mask, talking about how terrible it is, banning him from

engaging in his livelihood again, etc.

I don't live in Missouri, so maybe this should not be an issue with me.

But it is an issue with me because I don't like what is happening in this country.  There have always been presidential masks to poke fun at presidents; I even recall that the year before presidential elections, the soothsayers used the rate of purchase of the 2 candidates as a predictor of who would win the election. It was all in fun.  There have been movies made of bank robbers who wore presidential masks so they could not be identified on the security cameras of the bank they were robbing. I remember dummies of George Bush burned in effigy by his detractors.  I do not remember the firestorm of criticism against the folks who did that- they were exercising their first amendment rights.

But for some reason, your elected officials in Missouri suddenly think that this president is above poking fun at? Is it because he is half black and we need to pussyfoot around and walk on eggs because of that? Is it because they are all flaming leftists who you have elected and they will not have the leftist in the white house criticized?  No matter what their rationale is- we still have the first amendment in America, which gives all Americans a right to criticize or poke fun at the president, even this one.

Now I see that the NAACP demands an investigation of this rodeo clown.  It quickly gets very ugly, doesn't it?   I want you to know my thoughts on this because I have taken advantage many times of your daily deals on quilting fabrics, but you may not be seeing me make purchases in the future.  I do not want to support businesses in a state where the elected officials don't support the freedom of speech rights of American citizens. You may think I am off base, that's ok. As we continue to have more rights taken away by an obtrusive, out of control government, you will understand where I am coming from.

When obamacare was rammed down the throats of America, one of the slimy deals that was made to get the deal passed was the Nebraska cornhusker deal by Senator Ben Nelson

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091219164729AAc6UB7

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703580904574638301273467422.html  There are dozens of articles on this one topic, you can google them if you want.

But what you need to know that prior to this bill being passed, I was a constant long time customer of Omaha Steaks. I loved their product and ordered frequently, kept my freezer stocked with their meat and other goodies.  When their senator cut this dirty deal to be the last yes vote for obamacare, I sent them a similar letter as this, and I have never ordered from them again. They still send me coupon packs all the time. I just throw them in the trash.  It's not that there was anything wrong with their product- I just don't want to put money in the coffers of a state who elects corrupt politicians.

And so, though I really like your quilt fabrics, I want you to know IF I don't order any more, it will be because I don't want to put money in the coffers of your elected officials in Missouri.

America is in trouble, culturally, economically, and spiritually.  This president has been busy taking vacations to Africa for 100 million dollars, flying his dog up to Martha's Vinyard in a separate plane-which you and I paid for- while veterans who were maimed in the wars they fought for us cannot get timely health care to treat their injuries.  Our troops overseas are having their k-rations cut while our politicians live opulent lifestyles, shamelessly.  I am an American and I don't believe a governor in Missouri has the right to say anyone cannot criticize or poke fun at the corruption in our government.That would include the president, no matter who he is.

I have no idea who the rodeo clown was, what race he is, how old he is, or even if he is an American. He could be an illegal alien for all I know. But I believe he does not deserve this persecution, and I believe your governor should know better. You tell your governor and elected officials that their stand against the first amendment and statements about this rodeo clown are costing you business. 

When we take our vacation in our gas-eating motor home in the future, we will take the southern route. We will not be buying any gas in Missouri. I hope you understand why I am compelled to write you this.

Elections have consequences- for all of us.

cindy kucharski

Ft. Myers, Fl

  "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."    Theodore Roosevelt - 26th US President

Clowning the Os    August 15, 2013   By Jason Kissner

Who has not heard about the "iniquitous", white (and therefore guilty -- like Zimmerman, who of course is not white, but never mind) rodeo clown who donned an Obama mask?

Who has not gotten wind of the Ruling Aristocrat Oprah Winfrey's manufacture of a "racist victimization incident" with a Swiss sales clerk?

In consideration of the content of many conservative articles and comments on the subjects, I am going to be so bold as to suggest that many conservatives still do not want to come to grips with the true function of racial discourse in this country.

As a consequence, many conservative responses are as naïve as they are myopic.

Protestations of the form "look at the Bush masks; look all the Bush hate; the sales clerk wasn't a racist after all and Oprah should apologize" are fruitless, and will continue to be fruitless until matters are set right.

Matters are not going to be set right until Americans take fully on board the brute fact that the "dialogue" on race in this country is, quite literally, psychotic.

That this is so is easily seen by reflection that, for example, the racial "dialogue" we've been hectored about for several decades is in reality no "dialogue" at all; it is a monologue imposed by the powerful in order to decimate the values and individuality of the powerless.

When reality itself is completely contradicted by the description of it and the description is resolutely adhered to anyway, what you have is -- psychosis.

In the current historical moment, the psychosis is quite functional: it serves to facilitate "progress" toward full blown Marxo-Fascism.

Why was the rodeo clown branded a racist? Why did the MSM fail to question the veracity of Oprah's confabulation? Why was Zimmerman tried?

Because under Marxo-Fascism, individuals do not matter -- unless, of course, you are a member of the Ruling Class -- which is why, for example, people like Hypocrite Harry Reid feel no pressure to step down and support a minority candidate.

Thus, from the controlling vantage point of the Rulers, when the rodeo clown woke up on that "fateful" day, he was of course the same being he was when he fell asleep, which is to say either an overt racist, or a latent racist whose racism was, due to either the passage of time or the merest of deviations from Marxist script, invariably going to manifest itself.

With respect to the sales clerk (Adriana N.), she clowned Oprah, as the above linked articleshows.

The sales clerk stood her ground and insisted that her engagement with the minority titan was entirely proper.

The titan lied, and might have destroyed a life, but nonetheless Adriana N. is not going to receive anything approaching a sincere apology from power.

Why not?

Again, power has not seen fit to constitute either the sales clerk or the rodeo clown as individuals.

Because the Establishment view on race relations is psychotic and immune to consequences, it is "free" (in the way psychotic criminals are "free") to substitute fantasy for reality on issues of race.

That is, to the system, the rodeo clown and the sales clerk are mere placeholders; ciphers, or random variables, if you will.

If the first random white is not literally a racist, who cares -- the next one will be, and what's the first going to do about the false allegation? And, once more, what psychotic cares about the "literal" anyway?

Hence, what was in their hearts and minds is, according to Marxo-Fascism, wholly irrelevant, since no matter what resided in those places, there are surely tens of millions of other sets of hearts and minds wherein subsists evil worse than murder.

Surely there are tens of millions of racist white sales clerks and rodeo clowns in the suburbs of America!

The proof of this, of course, is that if these people were not racist, they would not live in the suburbs -- they would live in Detroit, which is, incidentally, where the clown Obama takes his "working" vacations, isn't it?

What was once the radical, collectivist view on race relations -- as exemplified by what looks to have been a terrorist act and a thoroughly hypocritical act committed by the sitting United States Attorney General Eric Holder -- is now the Establishment view, and that therefore what is really in the hearts and minds of people with respect to race is, from a historical point of view, completely irrelevant.

In the minds of these radicals, all roads are racialized, and all racialized roads must lead to one destination and one destination only: equality of outcome (excepting the 1% Rulers, of course) --which, by the way, is, beyond any dispute whatsoever, a socialist idea.

Thus, trillions of dollars and decades of affirmative action programs related to education, employment, and business have proven not to be enough, and so what is needed now is yet another dose of affirmative action whereby housing outcomes are to be racially engineered by the federal government.

This is of course strongly suggestive of the notion that behind the manufacturing of victims such as Trayvon lies hostility to liberty.

In sum, it is a brute fact that the collectivist cabals that compose the federal government and subsidiary holdings such as the MSM have determined that conservatives and libertarians are racists no matter what they say or do.

So what are conservatives going to do about it?

If the Marxo-Fascist dictator and his followers do not like certain sales clerks or rodeo clowns of the world, we might ask whether it is because they do not like being clowned, and, similarly, whether it is because they do not like clowns.

It would be decidedly odd if either if these possibilities were true.

Dr. Jason Kissner is associate professor of criminology at California State University, Fresno. You can reach him atcrimprof2010@hotmail.com.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/08/a_functional_psychosis.html#ixzz2c2l0kFVs
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Rep. Stockman invites banned MO rodeo clown to perform in Texas  August 15, 2013   Rick Moran

Three cheers for Rep. Steve Stockman who has placed the rodeo clown controversys in the proper context; a free speech issue.

MSNBC:  Texas Rep. Steve Stockman has invited the rodeo clown who impersonated President Obama at the Missouri State Fair this past weekend to perform at a rodeo in his home district.

The Republican congressman issued a statement Wednesday explaining why he wanted the rodeo clown to participate at a rodeo in Texas' 36th District.

"Liberals want to bronco bust dissent. But Texans value speech, even if its speech they don't agree with," Stockman said in the press release. "From Molly Ivins to Louie Gohmert and every opinion between Texans value free and open political speech. I'm sure any rodeo in Texas would be proud to have performers."

"Disagreeing with speech is one thing. Banning it and ordering citizens into reeducation classes for mocking a liberal leader is another," he continued in the release. "Liberals have targeted this man for personal destruction to create a climate of fear."

Missouri State Fair organizers apologized after video emerged showing the rodeo clown donning an Obama mask at an event. Crowds were heard in the clip cheering as the announcer asked if they wanted to see him trampled by a bull. Organizers later banned the rodeo clown from ever participating in the Missouri State Fair again.   [...]

Stockman called the performance in Missouri "a harmless gag."

"The idea to create a state of fear and make people afraid to trivialize Obama. No one tried to personally destroy the rodeo clown who wore a George H.W. Bush mask," he said.

Officials from the Houston Livestock and Rodeo say the Texas Republican never contacted them about inviting the rodeo clown. The vice president of the organization told Politico that Stockman "has no authority to invite any person to perform at our show."

And Rush Limbaugh also correctly identified the free speech angle with a brilliant example: (No, I haven't changed my mind about Limbaugh)

This burns me. This is outrageous. This is no different than what happened in all those countries that had the cartoons of the prophet and militant Muslims had a cow over it, went nuts. It's exactly what's happening here. What do we have, a president of the United States who is above all this? We have a president who's above criticism, above being mocked, above being laughed at? We have not just a president, we have an entire Democrat political party and the American left which thinks that they are so damn special that they cannot be mocked, they cannot be made fun of.

There's a great quote by C. S. Lewis. You know who C. S. Lewis was. See, if I even quote C. S. Lewis I'll get myself in a little bit of trouble here. I'd have to paraphrase. I don't have it right in front of me. C. S. Lewis said the devil can't stand being made fun of.The devil can't stand being mocked. He actually used the word "mocked." You people on the left, I know you don't have the capacity for shame, but this is just absolutely --a clown now fearing for his life? Everybody involved in the fair quitting. The state of Missouri acting like it's profoundly embarrassed to be alive. A bunch of people with nothing better on their hands to do, running around trying to make a federal, big, gigantic issue out of this.

Who cares if it was offensive. To who? Haven't heard Obama complain about it. It's like I'm saying, if I were the president of the United States, and I saw what this was doing, I'd put a stop to it. The next time I was on TV, I'd reference it. I'd have a smile on my face, I'd laugh about it, and I'd have everybody calm down. A little leadership. But, no, this guy, I am convinced he's right in there with all this punishment. He's right in there with all these people being taken out because of this, because he's above being made fun of, he's above being mocked, he's above being criticized. I have no doubt about that.

The video of the rodeo clown's schtick shows absolutely nothing that can remotely be conceived as "racist." As I've mentioned previously, it may be in bad taste to ask if the crowd wants to see Obama run down by a bull, but everyone knew the guy in the mask was a clown, and everyone knew that it wasn't really President Obama. Where's the racism?

I've said this previously on these pages; the massive and relentless use of the race card has resulted in the unintended consequence that nobody believes the accusers anymore.Shouting "racist" at the drop of a hat has diluted the word's power to the point that only liberals believe it matters to anyone.

Limbaugh nails it; the over the top reaction by liberals - and the cowering of Republicans in the face of criticism - is exactly what happened with Muslim hysteria about a bunch of cartoons and the reaction by much of the western press who refused to show their readers what the fuss was about.

Stockman probably won't get his wish. And the rodeo clowns will go through their re-education er..., I mean their "sensitivity training" so they won't make fun of Obama again.

But might I suggest a "Parody Obama Day" where anyone and everyone lets loose with the broadest, most satirical, most pointed mirth-making at the president's expense? The only way to fight attempts to limit speech is to shout what is being attacked from the rooftops - and often.

(Glenn Beck did this on his radio show. Thanks, Glenn, for keeping it real. KathyD)
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/08/rep_stockman_invites_banned_mo_rodeo_clown_to_perform_in_texas.html#ixzz2c2lfJuts
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

A Swiss Clerk Teaches Us About Racism and Profiteering   August 15, 2013    By Jeffrey T. Brown

Is racism a real problem in the United States, or is it the calculated and fraudulent branding and stigma that strategically attaches to the target of an accusation of racism? That exploitation, ignoring for now the damage it does to its target, has proven to be very profitable to the accusers, whether in pursuit of employment, admissions, benefits, political power or even promoting a movie.Apart from the sympathy that flows to the self-proclaimed "victim", even if reflexively rather than from any merit in the accusation, there is the publicity and the opportunity to decry the affront, which is the victim's new right. There is the priceless platform for the victim to force him or herself on the public, which is not otherwise offered to those living quietly in one of the least racist countries in the world. Where's the publicity or gain in merely living as a person to whom every opportunity is available to achieve unlimited success?

There is a purposeful malice in this exploitation that is disturbing, especially when the specter of pervasive racism is invoked by those who know the lie they tell. At the pinnacle of our culture, enjoying all the financial and prestigious rewards this free country can convey, they lecture us on how hard their lives are because of their professed belief in our intolerance and meanness.

So in the last several years, and even more so in recent months, the left's message is that we live in the most racist, oppressive country on Earth, at least according to the self-appointed oppressed and their elite spokespersons. And who are these damaged victims of such flagrant oppression, from whom we hear of hardship and discrimination? Why, some of the wealthiest and most privileged among us: the athletes, the movie stars, the entertainers, the celebrities. And yes, the most powerful politicians in the world. Apparently, wealth, privilege, opportunity and power are the new oppression. Who knew? It seems that no one knows oppression like those who have freely achieved vastly more wealth and power than their imagined oppressors.

During the presidency of our "post-racial" president, decades of progress have been consciously erased by those who have sensed an opportunity, led by the daily example of this very same president, to make the accusation of racism pay off, knowing it is a lie. The eradication of past progress is actually welcomed by these destroyers, since endless racial strife means endless exploitation and opportunity for those positioned to profit. If the clock is constantly turned back, every fight must be fought over again, as if nothing has ever changed. Those who did their part in good faith had no idea it was all a game, but they are coming around to the truth.

These heralds of our national sin are the embodiment of unrestrained self-absorption. They lie to us and themselves that by proclaiming their own victimhood, and someone else's imagined bigotry, they are harkening a greater good, with no sense of the irony of the entire exercise. In reality, of course, they are doing untold damage. The vast majority of Americans, who are not racists, have long been forced to listen to what they know are lies told about them, and many are coming to resent it deeply. We are going backward, by design.

We have been recently treated to the rather obscene spectacle of Oprah Winfrey, a black woman who has achieved unlimited acceptance, success, wealth and power in the least racist nation on Earth, lecturing us on the mythical lynching of "millions" of blacks, while promoting a racially themed movie for which she was doubtless paid millions of dollars. How's that for victimhood? For what it's worth, the actual number of persons lynched between 1882 and 1968 has been calculated at less than 5000, and of those, it seems one in four were white. Can you guess the political affiliation of those doing the lynching versus those being lynched? There weren't very many white Republicans in the South, thanks to Mr. Lincoln.

Following closely on the heels of Ms. Winfrey's historical lie, she has more recently found herself in the uncomfortable position of accusing someone of racism who is not accustomed to simply accepting the label, as most white Americans are conditioned to do. Apparently, the rules are different outside the United States, which Ms. Winfrey failed to take intoaccount. Those in Switzerland who are not racist will actually object loudly to being branded for someone else's amusement, or gain, and expose the lie. A Swiss store clerk has done exactly that, implicitly calling out Oprah Winfrey on a lie she thought she could get away with if she kept it vague enough, other than the whiteness of the accused.Now, embarrassed by the exposure, Ms. Winfrey is pretending it was all a misunderstanding, and saying she wished it had not gotten blown out of proportion.It seems that not every white has been taught they owe apologies and repentance when accused of racism by profiteers.

Of course, we are not allowed to similarly speak in our own defense in the United States in matters of race. To examine facts and object to lies when told by racialist opportunists is itself evidence of racism. For Americans, it was otherworldly to see a false race accuser called out publicly. I guess the falsely accused can do that in countries where the politically correct narrative is not rigged to blindly honor the liar, rather than the truth, when the lie is about race. Had a white person in this country done what the Swiss store clerk did, he would have his name and reputation entirely destroyed by the liberal race machine, which exists to ensure that we never speak truthfully about race in the United States.

The left's protection of the president is a further illustration of this reality. He and his lickspittles have made every reaction to his petty politics a "dog whistle" for racism. The attorney general is similarly inclined, consciously serving only 'his people' by disregarding their criminality when it occurs, as historical payback. It is unseemly and repulsive, but that's what makes it so attractive to liberals. They swim in an ever expanding cesspool of offensive behavior, happy to tear down the barriers of morality and ethics that prevented the malcontents before them from destroying the civil society in their time. They relish the knowledge that their gains are inversely proportionate to the preservation of a greater good, without which a moral society will die.

Make no mistake. The exploitation of race for profit and advantage in this country is a key part of the ongoing efforts to kill off the remnants of the old, Constitutional United States. Even Mrs. Clinton understands the advantage of lying to and about blacks. She purportedly objects to voter ID laws because of their supposedly negative impact on blacks, but is never asked about the implications of this view. At the heart of the matter, if we assume that Democrats are sincere, isn't the implication that Democrats believe blacks are so stupid and lazy that they cannot obtain readily available and free forms of identification, which they otherwise need for everything? Why is this obvious premise never challenged by the left? Perhaps it is because there is no disagreement from within the left.

For those blacks who stay silent, not objecting to their perpetual insult for the sake of the benefits they think that Democrats bestow upon them, they are doubly betrayed. After all, the voter ID fight is not even about them. It's about the votes of illegal immigrants, whose presence in growing numbers only ensures that fewer jobs, opportunities and benefits will be available for the loyal blacks who still await the deliverance that Democrats will promise them until they no longer need to. As illegals vote in greater numbers and become the dominant percentage of the Democrat base, blacks will find themselves in the same place that others have when their utility to liberals has exhausted itself.

The left sincerely hopes that we never become as honest and vocal as a Swiss store clerk. To ensure we do not, they will continue to strategically brand their opponents as racists for as long as there are halfwits who sell it, buy it, and apologize for it. 

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/08/a_swiss_clerk_teaches_us_about_racism_and_profiteering.html#ixzz2c2ouv8UY
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Kathleen Rae Doan

As A Mom Coordinator Region #8

"Sisterhood of Mommy Patriots"

AsAMomKathy@reagan.com   * 239-246-4150C         

Kathy LibertyLady: http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?id=10000052376203

AsAMom.org  

“To save man from the morass of propaganda, in my opinion, is one of the chief aims of education. 

Education must enable one to sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false, the real from the unreal, and the facts from the fiction.”

-- Dr. Martin Luther King